Fix broken install Makefile target, update README#214
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 58 minutes and 9 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Makefile ChangesInstall target fix and README update
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 101: The comment referencing the `MAIN_IMAGE_TAG` environment variable is
outdated since the example above now uses the `-t` flag approach (deploy -t
4.11.0). Update the line that says "Specify the `MAIN_IMAGE_TAG` as desired" to
reflect the current `-t` flag method, or remove it entirely if the approach is
self-evident from the example above.
- Line 99: The README documentation examples uniformly use version 4.11.0, but
the codebase default for `defaultMainImageTag` in internal/helpers/tag.go is set
to 4.9.2, creating a mismatch. Update the `defaultMainImageTag` constant to
4.11.0 to align the code default with the documented examples. This ensures
consistency so users who follow README examples or omit the version flag receive
the same version as the documentation shows.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 64d6dac7-41f4-4681-a146-d2ebedab86f8
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
MakefileREADME.md
installMakefiletarget (it was broken before).README.READMEREADME: Use--tag/-tinstead ofMAIN_IMAGE_TAG, don't reference outdated ACS versions.Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores