Conversation
Contributor
|
@radicalrafi The |
Member
|
@radicalrafi looks like some travis CI issues? |
Author
|
Mostly syntax issue going to fix them asap |
|
Damn, added this myself and just noticed your pull request. Foolish me, still getting the hang of the workflow and git in general. |
ghost
closed this
madhavajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2021
* fixing broken test * moving socketIO workers to grid project * fixing tests
madhavajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2021
* fixing broken test * moving socketIO workers to grid project * fixing tests
rasswanth-s
pushed a commit
to rasswanth-s/PySyft
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2026
…on_usage FIX run_custom_app_config
This pull request was closed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After doing some research on slice and objects it seems that overload __getitem ([] operator) can be done using a simple hack since we are using numpy as underlying library for .data member we can pass it directly and wrap it around a TensorBase object when returning it .
This needs to be heavily looked at @swaroopch @iamtrask @cereallarceny