Skip to content

<fix>[kvm]: fail VM start when host file changed but sync fails#3741

Closed
zstack-robot-2 wants to merge 1 commit into
feature-zsv-5.0.0-vm-support-vtpm-and-secucebootfrom
sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2
Closed

<fix>[kvm]: fail VM start when host file changed but sync fails#3741
zstack-robot-2 wants to merge 1 commit into
feature-zsv-5.0.0-vm-support-vtpm-and-secucebootfrom
sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2

Conversation

@zstack-robot-2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

When syncing VM host file from the origin host fails, check
whether the file has been updated (changeDate != null). If so,
it is unsafe to start the VM with stale cached content, so fail
the flow instead of silently continuing.

Also clean up VmHostBackupFileVO after a successful write to
avoid stale backup records.

Resolves: ZSV-11675
Related: ZSV-11310

Change-Id: I6a73636169727a6f7265766b696c6f6d70747676

sync from gitlab !9609

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

在 KvmSecureBootExtensions 中调整 VM 主机文件同步流程:新增 syncFromOriginHostSuccess 标志、改变源主机读取成功/失败处理、在同步失败时校验并可能丢弃缓存内容、以及在写入成功时清理备份记录(删除 VmHostBackupFileVO)。

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
KVM VM 主机文件流程
plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java
PrepareHostFileContext 新增布尔字段 syncFromOriginHostSuccess(默认 false);在 read-vm-host-file-from-origin-host 成功时立即设为 true 并继续,失败时若已缓存且 vmHostFile.changeDate != null 则以 operr(...) 失败,否则保留原有警告并继续;初次加载的 VmHostFileVO 立即写入 context.vmHostFile;新增 NoRollbackFlow 步骤 check-content-for-vm-host-file-if-sync-failed(当同步失败且有缓存但无内容时将 context.vmHostFile 置空);在 re-read-vm-host-file-from-dest-host 后新增 NoRollbackFlow 步骤 clean-backup,当 context.vmBackupFileVO != nullcontext.writeSuccess == true 时删除对应 VmHostBackupFileVO 记录。

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Flow as FlowEngine
    participant Origin as OriginHost
    participant Dest as DestHost
    participant DB as Database

    Flow->>DB: 读取本地缓存 `VmHostFileVO`
    Flow->>Origin: 请求读取 VM 主机文件
    alt 读取成功
        Origin-->>Flow: 返回 VmHostFile
        Flow->>Flow: context.syncFromOriginHostSuccess = true
        Flow->>Flow: trigger.next()
    else 读取失败
        Origin-->>Flow: 返回错误
        Flow->>DB: 检查缓存 `VmHostFileVO.changeDate`
        alt changeDate != null
            Flow->>Flow: 返回 operr(...) 并失败流程
        else
            Flow->>Flow: 记录警告并 trigger.next()
            Flow->>DB: 若缓存存在但无内容,则将 context.vmHostFile 置空
        end
    end
    Flow->>Dest: 重新读取或写入至目标主机
    alt 写入成功 且 context.vmBackupFileVO != null
        Flow->>DB: 删除对应 VmHostBackupFileVO 记录
    end
Loading

评估代码审查工作量

🎯 4 (复杂) | ⏱️ ~60 分钟

诗句

🐰 新旗标记来报到,
源读若回立刻跳;
失败有痕需分辨,
缓存空缺则抛掉;
写成之后备份飘。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: failing VM start when host file sync fails but the file has been updated, which is the core objective of this PR.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly relates to the changeset, explaining the rationale for checking changeDate on sync failure and cleaning up backup records, matching the code changes.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2 branch from 7382aa2 to 6215e6d Compare April 14, 2026 07:11

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java (1)

321-326: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

不要在源主机同步成功前就把 context.vmHostFile 视为可用。

Line 321 先写入 context.vmHostFile 后,read-vm-host-file-from-backup 在 Lines 379-380 会被直接跳过。这样一旦源主机同步失败但 changeDate == null,而 MN 里又没有对应的 VmHostFileContentVO,Lines 425-429 只会记录 skip 并继续,最终可能带着缺失的 NVRAM/TPM 状态继续启动。这里应只在确认同步成功,或确认 MN 已有可用内容后,再设置 context.vmHostFile

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`
around lines 321 - 326, The code assigns context.vmHostFile too early (in
KvmSecureBootExtensions) causing read-vm-host-file-from-backup to be skipped and
potentially allowing boot with missing NVRAM/TPM; change to first fetch into a
local VmHostFileVO (e.g., vmHostFileLocal) using
Q.New(VmHostFileVO.class)...find(), then perform the backup-read and existence
checks (inspect changeDate and lookup for corresponding VmHostFileContentVO) and
only after confirming the source sync succeeded or that MN already has valid
VmHostFileContentVO, assign context.vmHostFile = vmHostFileLocal; ensure the
error/skip branch (the logic around changeDate and VmHostFileContentVO presence)
fails or retries instead of leaving context.vmHostFile set.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Outside diff comments:
In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`:
- Around line 321-326: The code assigns context.vmHostFile too early (in
KvmSecureBootExtensions) causing read-vm-host-file-from-backup to be skipped and
potentially allowing boot with missing NVRAM/TPM; change to first fetch into a
local VmHostFileVO (e.g., vmHostFileLocal) using
Q.New(VmHostFileVO.class)...find(), then perform the backup-read and existence
checks (inspect changeDate and lookup for corresponding VmHostFileContentVO) and
only after confirming the source sync succeeded or that MN already has valid
VmHostFileContentVO, assign context.vmHostFile = vmHostFileLocal; ensure the
error/skip branch (the logic around changeDate and VmHostFileContentVO presence)
fails or retries instead of leaving context.vmHostFile set.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 23027116-6022-4ee5-9890-a782a4ce76dc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff216d7 and 6215e6d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java

@ZStack-Robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment from ye.zou:

Code Review

# 严重程度 分类 文件 问题描述 修复建议
1 🔴 Critical 回归/正确性 KvmSecureBootExtensions.java:321 backup fallback 路径被破坏。 改动把 context.vmHostFile 的赋值从 sync 成功回调里移到了 query 时(context.vmHostFile = Q.New(...)...find())。这导致 read-vm-host-file-from-backup 的 skip 条件 context.vmHostFile != null(第 381 行)在 VmHostFileVO 存在时永远为 true——即使 sync 失败且 changeDate == null。旧代码中,sync 失败时 vmHostFile 为 null,会 fallback 到 backup;现在这条路径断了。场景:VM 原先在 host A 正常关机(changeDate=null),host A 宕机后 VM 在 host B 启动,sync 失败但 backup 有数据——旧代码用 backup 恢复,新代码直接跳过 backup,VM 启动时没有 NvRam/TpmState 内容。 把 skip 条件改为 context.syncFromOriginHostSuccess 或等价语义,确保 sync 失败时仍能 fallback 到 backup。
2 🟡 Major 回归/正确性 KvmSecureBootExtensions.java:414-416 write step 在 sync 失败时行为变化。 write-vm-host-file-to-dest-host 的 skip 条件检查 context.vmHostFile == null。现在 vmHostFile 始终非 null(只要 VO 存在),write step 不再被 skip,会用 vmHostFile.getUuid() 查 content。如果 sync 失败,content 可能是过期的或不存在的——虽然 content == null 时会 skip,但如果 content 存在且是旧版本,就会把 stale 内容写到目标 host。这和 MR 标题的安全意图矛盾。 在 write step 的 skip 条件中也考虑 syncFromOriginHostSuccess,只有 sync 成功或有 backup 时才执行 write。
3 🟠 Minor 死代码 KvmSecureBootExtensions.java:296 syncFromOriginHostSuccess 字段被赋值但从未被读取。看起来应该用在 read-vm-host-file-from-backup 的 skip 条件里(替代原来的 context.vmHostFile != null),但实际没有用上。这是 #1 的根因——字段加了但忘了用。 在 backup step 的 skip() 中使用 context.syncFromOriginHostSuccess 替代 context.vmHostFile != null
4 🔵 Trivial 注释拼写 KvmSecureBootExtensions.java (clean-backup step) "now we has lastest VmHostFileVO" → 语法错误 + 拼写错误。 "now we have the latest VmHostFileVO"

结论: BLOCK 🚫

回归风险: 高 — backup fallback 路径被无意中破坏,影响所有依赖 backup 恢复 NvRam/TpmState 的场景(host 宕机后 HA 启动、跨 host 启动等)。

修复建议: 核心问题是 context.vmHostFile 语义变了但下游 skip 条件没跟着改。syncFromOriginHostSuccess 字段已经加了,把它用上:

  1. read-vm-host-file-from-backupskip() 改为 return context.syncFromOriginHostSuccess;(而非 context.vmHostFile != null
  2. write-vm-host-file-to-dest-hostskip() 同步适配
  3. 补充单测覆盖 "sync 失败 + changeDate=null + backup 存在" 场景

@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2 branch from 6215e6d to 8837cd2 Compare April 14, 2026 07:42

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java (1)

321-356: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

同步成功后要重新查询最新的 VmHostFileVO

Line 321 在 sync 之前就把 context.vmHostFile 固定成了旧记录,但同文件 Line 709-710 已经说明这类 sync 会创建新记录。现在 Line 355 成功后直接 trigger.next(),后面的 Line 440 仍会按旧 UUID 取内容,可能把旧缓存写回目标主机,等于把这次成功 sync 的结果丢掉了。建议在成功分支重新查询最新 VmHostFileVO,并同步更新 context.path

🛠 建议修改
                 bus.send(syncMsg, new CloudBusCallBack(trigger) {
                     `@Override`
                     public void run(MessageReply reply) {
                         if (reply.isSuccess()) {
+                            context.vmHostFile = Q.New(VmHostFileVO.class)
+                                    .eq(VmHostFileVO_.type, context.type)
+                                    .eq(VmHostFileVO_.vmInstanceUuid, context.vmUuid)
+                                    .orderByDesc(VmHostFileVO_.lastOpDate)
+                                    .limit(1)
+                                    .find();
+                            if (context.vmHostFile == null) {
+                                trigger.fail(operr("failed to find latest %s vm host file for VM[vmUuid=%s] after sync",
+                                        context.type, context.vmUuid));
+                                return;
+                            }
+                            context.path = context.vmHostFile.getPath();
                             context.syncFromOriginHostSuccess = true;
                             trigger.next();
                             return;
                         }

另外建议补一条回归用例,覆盖“origin sync 成功并生成新 VO,后续必须使用新内容写目标主机”的场景。

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`
around lines 321 - 356, The callback success path currently leaves
context.vmHostFile pointing at the pre-sync record, so after reply.isSuccess()
re-query the latest VmHostFileVO for context.type and context.vmUuid (e.g.
Q.New(VmHostFileVO.class).eq(VmHostFileVO_.type,
context.type).eq(VmHostFileVO_.vmInstanceUuid,
context.vmUuid).orderByDesc(VmHostFileVO_.lastOpDate).limit(1).find()), update
context.vmHostFile and context.path from that fresh VO, then continue with
trigger.next(); also add a regression test covering “origin sync creates new VO
and subsequent write uses new VO/path” to prevent regressions.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`:
- Line 521: The inline comment in KvmSecureBootExtensions.java (around the code
handling VmHostFileVO/VmHostBackupFileVO in the method where the latest host
file is ensured) contains two typos: change "has" to "have" and "lastest" to
"latest" so the comment reads something like "// now we have latest
VmHostFileVO, and VmHostBackupFileVO should be cleaned." Update the comment near
the code that references VmHostFileVO and VmHostBackupFileVO in class
KvmSecureBootExtensions to improve readability.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`:
- Around line 321-356: The callback success path currently leaves
context.vmHostFile pointing at the pre-sync record, so after reply.isSuccess()
re-query the latest VmHostFileVO for context.type and context.vmUuid (e.g.
Q.New(VmHostFileVO.class).eq(VmHostFileVO_.type,
context.type).eq(VmHostFileVO_.vmInstanceUuid,
context.vmUuid).orderByDesc(VmHostFileVO_.lastOpDate).limit(1).find()), update
context.vmHostFile and context.path from that fresh VO, then continue with
trigger.next(); also add a regression test covering “origin sync creates new VO
and subsequent write uses new VO/path” to prevent regressions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f647ef3a-8e23-4339-8996-ba6df56a6083

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6215e6d and 8837cd2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java

Comment thread plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java Outdated
@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2 branch from 8837cd2 to f1e4687 Compare April 14, 2026 07:54

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`:
- Around line 519-526: In KvmSecureBootExtensions.run, you're only deleting the
VmHostBackupFileVO which leaves associated VmHostFileContentVO rows orphaned;
update the flow to also delete VmHostFileContentVO entries tied to
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid() (mirroring the pattern in
VmHostFileTracker.deleteBackupFileFromDb) by issuing a
SQL.New(VmHostFileContentVO.class).eq(...,
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid()).delete() before or alongside deleting
VmHostBackupFileVO, ensuring both deletions occur within this flow before
calling trigger.next().
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c3ab4fe3-a3d4-40bc-bc79-22b638e675ed

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8837cd2 and f1e4687.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java

Comment on lines +519 to +526
@Override
public void run(FlowTrigger trigger, Map data) {
// now we have latest VmHostFileVO, and VmHostBackupFileVO should be cleaned.
SQL.New(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)
.eq(VmHostBackupFileVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
.delete();
trigger.next();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

缺少关联 VmHostFileContentVO 的删除。

仅删除 VmHostBackupFileVO 会导致关联的 VmHostFileContentVO 记录孤立在数据库中。根据 VmHostFileTracker.deleteBackupFileFromDb 的实现模式(见相关代码片段 3),删除备份文件时应同时删除其内容记录。

🐛 建议修复:同时删除关联内容
             `@Override`
             public void run(FlowTrigger trigger, Map data) {
                 // now we have latest VmHostFileVO, and VmHostBackupFileVO should be cleaned.
-                SQL.New(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)
-                        .eq(VmHostBackupFileVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
-                        .delete();
+                new SQLBatch() {
+                    `@Override`
+                    protected void scripts() {
+                        sql(VmHostFileContentVO.class)
+                                .eq(VmHostFileContentVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
+                                .delete();
+                        sql(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)
+                                .eq(VmHostBackupFileVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
+                                .delete();
+                    }
+                }.execute();
                 trigger.next();
             }
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`
around lines 519 - 526, In KvmSecureBootExtensions.run, you're only deleting the
VmHostBackupFileVO which leaves associated VmHostFileContentVO rows orphaned;
update the flow to also delete VmHostFileContentVO entries tied to
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid() (mirroring the pattern in
VmHostFileTracker.deleteBackupFileFromDb) by issuing a
SQL.New(VmHostFileContentVO.class).eq(...,
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid()).delete() before or alongside deleting
VmHostBackupFileVO, ensuring both deletions occur within this flow before
calling trigger.next().

When syncing VM host file from the origin host fails, check
whether the file has been updated (changeDate != null). If so,
it is unsafe to start the VM with stale cached content, so fail
the flow instead of silently continuing.

Also clean up VmHostBackupFileVO after a successful write to
avoid stale backup records.

Resolves: ZSV-11675
Related: ZSV-11310

Change-Id: I6a73636169727a6f7265766b696c6f6d70747676
@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2 branch from f1e4687 to 140a351 Compare April 14, 2026 11:14

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java (1)

519-526: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

缺少关联 VmHostFileContentVO 的删除。

当前仅删除 VmHostBackupFileVO,会导致关联的 VmHostFileContentVO 记录在数据库中变成孤立数据。根据 write-vm-host-file-to-dest-host 步骤(第 440-444 行)的查询逻辑,VmHostFileContentVO.uuidVmHostBackupFileVO.uuid 共享相同的值。

🐛 建议修复:同时删除关联内容
             `@Override`
             public void run(FlowTrigger trigger, Map data) {
                 // now we have latest VmHostFileVO, and VmHostBackupFileVO should be cleaned.
-                SQL.New(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)
-                        .eq(VmHostBackupFileVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
-                        .delete();
+                new SQLBatch() {
+                    `@Override`
+                    protected void scripts() {
+                        sql(VmHostFileContentVO.class)
+                                .eq(VmHostFileContentVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
+                                .delete();
+                        sql(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)
+                                .eq(VmHostBackupFileVO_.uuid, context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid())
+                                .delete();
+                    }
+                }.execute();
                 trigger.next();
             }
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`
around lines 519 - 526, The flow currently only deletes VmHostBackupFileVO and
leaves orphaned VmHostFileContentVO rows; update the run(...) block in
KvmSecureBootExtensions (the anonymous Flow implementation) to also delete
VmHostFileContentVO entries matching context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid() by adding
a SQL.New(VmHostFileContentVO.class).eq(VmHostFileContentVO_.uuid,
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid()).delete() call alongside the existing
SQL.New(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)...delete() so both the backup file and its
associated file content are removed.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Duplicate comments:
In `@plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java`:
- Around line 519-526: The flow currently only deletes VmHostBackupFileVO and
leaves orphaned VmHostFileContentVO rows; update the run(...) block in
KvmSecureBootExtensions (the anonymous Flow implementation) to also delete
VmHostFileContentVO entries matching context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid() by adding
a SQL.New(VmHostFileContentVO.class).eq(VmHostFileContentVO_.uuid,
context.vmBackupFileVO.getUuid()).delete() call alongside the existing
SQL.New(VmHostBackupFileVO.class)...delete() so both the backup file and its
associated file content are removed.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 92f78a3f-bb57-4041-a32c-0ea6821b45ed

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1e4687 and 140a351.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • plugin/kvm/src/main/java/org/zstack/kvm/efi/KvmSecureBootExtensions.java

@ZStack-Robot ZStack-Robot deleted the sync/wenhao.zhang/zsv-ldap-2 branch April 15, 2026 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants